Dancing &Co

Dancing and Bernstein*** and Simon Says.
Is Roger Simon concidering a genre change?
Or has he always been so sharp? 
Unlike?(Wall Street Joe?)[Or is it Mourning Joe?]


9-28-12  Follow-up :  Sharp Unlike.
Roger Simon's parody of a mockery on the campaign trail **.  (Or cam pain?*)
Wall Street Journal agrees it is the stupid congress. 

*Tommy Christopher digs deeper. 'zzzzzzzz'
(Iron knee of sat ire read it completely.) 

**  (b.s. ). satire mockery
*** can Ohioans do math or what [!] ?
(I know percentage does not equal vote but I am employing mythmatic.  Chances of Romney win in Ohio below 4%. Yet to compare maps or 538.)   

[Bottomline:  It is not the prophets or Simon says corporate capitalizers, but it may be the Peter Paul and Mary principle.  No, just the Peter principle and robbing Paul to pay Peter.  A bird in the hand is worth not having two bushes or an etch-a-sketch Bush is more dangerous when they think they will do one^ better.] 

^ not to (fn) butt... 

Total eclipse of the

gut?
FuN[?]

9-26-12
President Obama mentioned a time warp.
Clinton mentioned arithmatic.
Not to leave it on a try angle, but...
UN Speech,*** 
filed to read*.

The Cycle** was particularly good yesterday.

* more with the apology mitt-flop
** not exactly

 [***There is no violence that justifies mindless speech. The only thing to fear is understanding itself. To Romney they are not bumps in the road, but that is what they are when you aren't kicking a can down the road.]

[ SatIre of a Mockery: Simone Says (?)]

*** 9-27-12  Just to be clear, there are no quotation marks in the 1st  bracketed['s]  while the satire in the 2nd broke later.  I am putting a spin on President Obama's point about free speech verses[!]
"terror".  While Roger Simone puts a spin on "free speech" and the Romney/Ryan campaign.  Not to mention Dansing Bernstein. 

[!]= (sic) or pun on versus or verse us cycle.(OK... it evolved.)

FN(Footnotes) not (fn): from the top
FB: Turn Around Bright Eyes
(YouTube): unembedded from FB
(Bloomberg unembedded)
try: The Fed’s Best Rationale for QE3
angle: Be Smart, Not Just Tough, in the Middle East
but: did Obama stand up?(under construction)

REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!]

(sic)or sarChasm of paradox: 
A return to economic sanity ? *

Appropriately there are only two links so far,
anachronistic^^ may they be: 
Andrew Leonard on the hope and change sanity at the Fed.
Sam Stein on raising the payroll cap on Social Secutity to fill the gap.

The Aster Risk[*] revolves on the Fight of the Century and Jon Stewart's take on "printing money" Bernanke**. (C-Mitt-\-warps)

Watch(out) for Lede Crack:*** 
"I don't want to be subjective, but it is my Austrian perspective."

* links Chasm and return Mitt time warps
** (a)YouTube, (b)60 Minutes, (c)NPR 
***(Step on a Rap)
[Lede Crack nails the paradox(fills the gap) of objective/subjectivism.]
Tacky Tact Tack: Romney Wrong Track^
Economy or Economics: NOT

^ Leder Tapes.
Mark Leder Tapes: Marc's pun on leader(and the twain)
[Belated Rebuttal or Re-Frame ? ]
(fn)
[^^ NOT TO MITT-FLOP: SNL(Salon Notes List) Marry X-mass [!] = (sic)]

[*] This footnote segues between Ding and A.(from earlier draft) leaving out the middle and emblematic of Mitt and his flip-flop of economics. (** a & b)  It is Keynesian not Supply or Demand. The Fight of the Century is a mockery of a satire on economics and the Deflation of Bernanke by Jon Stewart(**c) is a satire of a mockery of economics.
(fn)
[Um...Ouch ! ]

Tacky, tact, tack...

Who let the Dogfish* out?
Apology Cruise?

* not exactly [!]

Apology Cruise?  First, a Dogfish is a shark and I must admit to participating in their demise as a fisherman.  A billy-club or gaff hook is the tool of choice.  Second, Akin to fishing trips or the Romney Embassy gaff is Juan Coles hook to "Jumping the Shark".  Irony of Wrong Knees**, "legitimate rape" is almost long forgotten, what with the "empty chair" and the "Leder" Twain. 

** I am not implying Right or Wrong, only Diploma See.^

^ of Right and Wrong
S.E. Cupp
Evan Kohlmann

[9-20-12: or non-Prof-etiq et tu?  AM Clint 'n's Worlds?]

Off the Cuff

Or the bottom line ?
Only the twain?

See Label
(I pun on the Mark Leder Tapes)
I know it is inarticulate, but I like his style.  He does his own warm up act, but less than 3 minutes in he frames the future as "China working with us" or "something like Europe"...

See [Fog of Math!?]
Re: Off Track

The Trouble with the Mitt:
His 47% rant is political.  
His MC hammer is off. 
Not to pun on the MC but his nail is the 96%!

There is the trouble with his charts,


trouble with his "entitles"



and trouble both domestic















 and foreign.

I may be forgetting something but I shall probably return.

Re:Focus

TIME is not on anyone's side.

(NFRY)
related links : Joe Klein
Paralysis Rules
One for All and All for One
Is Romney a Realist or an Idealist?
Paul Ryan's Grand Vision
The Trouble with Simpson-Bowles

(fn) not yet

[Re-visit ! ?]

[Re:Boot ?]

[Let her role ?^^ ]
AM ?
NOW ?
Mitt-matic ?
Cheese US ?
Or Bane^ ? !
Or Diploma See!

^ The Best Defense(Mine'd Hive?)
^^ But a blimp[!] The Mark Leder Twain.

[Fog of Math!?]
[Brass Balls? Or Dorothy's Slippers?]

Trouble with the Curve?

 

W'rithmatic and the Empty Chair.
It's Marvelous! *


Obama is 4... the 96%!

*not an endorsement


Waaaaa!!!!!  ;-): 

The Top 5%** income brackets pay 38% of total taxes collected on 35% of the nations income, while the bottom 95% pay ONLY 62% of taxes on 64% of the nations total income[!***]




** thanks to Jared Bernstein's colleagues and Citizens for Tax Justice.
*** real math is not that inciteful !

...promote the general...

Welfare(the 29th word in the Constitution).



Pre-Obama^, starker contrast.

And this is^^^ pre-Romney's Rough Road on MSNBC.
Jobs First? But not foremost.  Running from politics. 
His best defense is his cuff and hope he is phoney and fisher of men.
(I won't go there.) But the map is looking familiar. 
Fixing News(pun on breaking news): Carney(Obama "we are in this together").

Ari Melber is almost there where I haven't gotten yet. That is, what is actually taken from the paychecks of the middle class.  Payroll tax. NOW Alex Wagner is almost there.  Not only do the top 4%* get the same tax deductions and breaks as the bottom brackets(a. how many %) they get a break from the payroll tax from a second and third point. (b. over $97,500  c. capital gains ) 






[Now please take no offense at the significance of any Cretans.]

* 96% should be the Obama "entitle" R's [!]**

NOTE: Charts are being filled out here. See PAGES (right column)
NOTE: Charts of Sorts.( Tetra Heed Rons, and Wedges & Corny Copy Yeah)

** rough math but look at the right side of the second chart and see on the left that $250,000 -- and now John Sununu is doing the W'rithatic on Andrea Mitchell, but it goes to the arithmatic that is wrong -- it should be clear that the middle class is well below what Romney thinks it is and the President is for the bottom 96% well more than the 47% Romney thinks supports Obama.

^ missing link as to how I stumbled on this one (but there is a mixing of metaphors for horses and Teddy(Obama^^) Bulls. 
^^

^^^ inserted post charts et al
[Last Word ? Yeah right ! Or Left ! Re: Cycle ? R ! Not !]
[Brilliance of Democracy.]

[Strategic Pause: News Nation: No, Time is not a-side ! ]

[What the heck is the point?  It is the process and the purpose.]

One Heckuva Day.

I take this opportunity to note belatedly the 225th birthday of the Constitution, and the 1st Anniversary of Occupy Wallstreet, but Mitt still takes the day hands down. 

9-18-12
http://billmoyers.com/2012/09/14/what-the-founding-fathers-wanted/
The Dickens you say ?[!]

Obama the Uniter!

It is about the politics.  I am not finished searching for a reference* I recently heard George W. Bush make, but it was in retrospect about his handling of politics and how he did not worry about it**.  Apparently it was someone elses job.  But what is the politics(?) is my point.^  Bush claimed himself the uniter. Obama is the uniter of politics.  As in there is the partisan divide, and there is nothing wrong with making that clear, but there is the political process which Romney is also not all about, let alone making it clear.   

*what me worry?  Applies to GWB, Reagan, Mitt and facts
** Rove was believe somehow involved, and probably Cheney
*** I might be getting warmR but I have not embedded this asterisk yet.

^ more what Mittastrophe?

Politics is local?

Ground Game ? *

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/an-embassy-statement-a-tweet-and-a-major-misunderstanding/2012/09/12/a2d32a8c-fd24-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_blog.html

http://open.salon.com/blog/ted_frier/2012/09/12/losing_gop_in_denial_over_own_failures
http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/why_i_left_the_gop/

http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/mitt%E2%80%99s_shameful_libya_statement/
http://theweek.com/article/index/233148/the-death-of-an-american-in-libya

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/an-embassy-statement-a-tweet-and-a-major-misunderstanding/2012/09/12/a2d32a8c-fd24-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_blog.html

http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/cairo_embassys_statement_what_went_wrong/

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032608/ns/meet_the_press-meet_the_press/vp/48959856/#48959768 ***

Not the usual MO.** 

[ http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepolitics/2012/09/13/house-race-koster-opts-for-the-full-romney/ ]

*Scroll over is sufficient until [fn] and post /under-construction(also redux labels) R done.
** "well" not exactly [!]

*** dropped link [!]

[Unfinished read, refinished read.(perspectivism) Politics over war.  Obama has made progress in foreign policy, but Republicans want to take it back.  The wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, and Iran(an evolution) are the examples of diplomacy(d) over preemption.  It all sprung from the 2000 election debacle, resistance to Clinton policy and the failure on September 11th with the supposed post-9-11 world.  But it is spelled out in the perspective that we cannot expect to teach democracy or politics over there, without practicing it over here(^).  I will refrain from further tangents or links on this post, but I will note that the two reads just mentioned also reflect a bit of a balancing act that is not nearly as cut and dry as it might be written.  One of the key differences in the big picture that makes the previous administration a stand out failure in American History is the combination of the voodoo(b) economics(arithmatic/fuzzy math+fuzzy English) with the neo-con perspective of American Exceptionalism (which is not) exemplified by choosing a war without paying for it.  The success that is so difficult is because politics is local except for them^(f).  This is demonstrated by the current Radical Republican opposition(c) to the Arab Spring,^^^ which removed dictators and is allowing(a) for democracy that might not turn out to be to our liking.  Bush said war is hard work, but just because you want to fight, does not mean that progress and peace(with diplomacy and politics) are not harder work, and more profitable.  That is part of true exceptionalism.

^refrain from a bumber snicker]

9-15-12
(a) FOX wrong about Libya says McCain.
(b) Foreign policy is Bane of Politics: bankruptcy bailout business not an option in either.
(c)  Loose lips? Republican Threat to National Security
(d) not! but whiney!

(^) ibid re^frain [see (d)]

9-17-12 (e) not embedded  i.e. that's right, there is no (e)
Seriously [!] folks ?
[^^ Apologies for sarcasm, but there is a diversity of reliability in the perspectives/sources provided.]
[NOW^^^ w/Alex Wagner w/Martin Basher on America Abroad.^^ But natural track of changing the strategy for Romney of change or status quo. i.e. hijacking change and boogieman status quo. Cam-Pain not working, Obama not running.]
[There is an (f) ]
^^ viscous cycle of anachronism
^^^ then Martin Bashir (NeoMitt)(Mittastrophe of asterisked?)

Rhetorical Been Laden[*] In-Chief

Raw Money ? [!]*
Or #2 man ?

[Actually I take a punt a bit far, but the Monday mourning quarterback is a field goal** behind.  I had earlier reacted to Romney not even being a water boy with his arithmatic***.]
[Or Rowdy Yeats ?]
[Been gone ? ]

* exception to the punctuation ?
** belated insert
*** also belated premption
[The domestic threat the GOP is over here is taken over there.]

[*] 9-14-12 asterisk added for English emphasis not bill yards.

[fn / under construction]

Refrain Post Frain?

It seems to come almost naturally to some***.  You might ask, what?  I won't go there, nor refrain.
Tan Gent not implied*, but it is a bit like a satire of a mockery. 
So here are some unread links to file for later.
Dangerous Narratives
Whose Maker
Obama Role
The Bounce?

* anachronism intended

Footnotes** Change

** click Footnotes for details

*** exception to the rule(bottom line) [Footnotes** Change] appropriately
i.e. yet to footnote but what the google[anachronism unintended] or is it?
[Not so RawMoney.]
[Ed Word]

[fn] Re:**

Fall-Awful on Mitt's Face!

The eleventh anniversary of September 11th had not yet passed when it was announced[^] that American embassies were under attack. 

Over this lede is the heading*[^^] that we need to turn around.***  It is bad enough that business is not the experience we need in the executive branch, but it certainly is not the same as diplomacy.** 

And foreign policy is really up there when it comes to trickle-down on the bottom line. But it really is more of a climate study with seeds of clouds so to speak and not passing the buck.[^^^] 

*Heading is the top line: Fall-Awful on Mitt's Face!
** Bush League Revisited?
*** apologies for Iron Knee or embedded nuance?

[^]9-13-12 due to update the link is not the earliest
[^^] my original source
[latest]

[Retro footnotes: scroll over for uncrossrhodes GPS.]

[fn]

Forward?

Looking Back at September 11th, 2001


 
 

[9-12-12:  Politics is always at the forefront.]

[fn]

Other Mysterious Ways...

There is W*rithmatic and After Math.

History:
George H.W. Bush**
Ronald Wilson Reagan ***
Bill Clinton: "arithmatic"*
George W. Bush

* "you do the vous do"(including links) was posted pre-Clinton's speech.
** H.W. was against it before he was after him(Reaganomics)
*** flip-flop

[fn]

Google Works...

in Mysterious Ways!
Or YouTube [!]

Now... the rest of the Harvey, for Pete sake (and Mary).^^

What transpired this morning was opening my blog from my desktop and reading "Mysterious "(scroll over or click on).  A Ty Cobb reference was embedded in my post.  He was also embedded(earlier) in a family photo as a frame liner or stuffing in the form of a Seattle papers sports section.  His batting average was around .410 at the time.  The photo is of my grandfather on skid row. (I walk past it every day as I come down the stairs for breakfast.) But it was not our dad's Skid Road.  It was a logging camp taken by an historic*** photographer with my granfather proudly centered.    

Literal Flip-flop?**
Not to tangent.*
[sorry for the anachronistic asterisks]

Obama is Ty Cobb in the following context:

The saying "All is fair in love and war" comes to mind. A google search brought up reference to Ty Cobb’s ability to stretch the rules and was used in reference to modern business tactics. Business aside, though that is the world he^ came from, it is interesting that some^ would make more rules (whether for couples or nations) when they in particular have trouble with following those that exist.

(but on the level field of dreams.)

We are the borg, not the cable guy or Picards.


* Is of sorts a tangent, as in a recent encounter with "Proust"
** link 2 "Ways" black and white
*** the one on my wall has not been found online, but found the 3rd link under the historic*** YouTube.
^ Bush league

[In context? Not to pun.]
^^ [Post edited for Pete..."sake (and Mary)"]

FOOTNOTE:  The third link is high-lighted.  The balance is how we get there.  The Mysterious Picards the content of context.

Four More Years!

[ Wednesday 9-5-12 Original Post 1:27 PM]

 

 

Turn Around* ?

 

Bill Maher is to Rush Limbaugh

as Isaac Asimov is to Ayn Rand.** 

(you do the vous due)*** 

 

* C-charts

** Harry Reid

*** Bill Clinton (or the three R's)

[RawMoney, Lyin', Writhmatic.]

[Republican concedes.]^^

 

[update: 9-6-12]

Note: Update anomoly or algorythm?

 

Sandra Fluke

Elizabeth Warren

(Jansing&Co and The Place for Politics^)

(Not finished with links)

(Original labels: cartoons, charts, DNC Convention, Obamanomics)  

Newt Rock Knee ?

^ Fluke Flays Romney
^^ Bill o'check? (inconvenient aster^^^risked)
^^^ You know you are a Tea Partier if...you expect a berg'R King,

Charlotte 2012!

The DNC Convention!
Turn-around is fair play. 
Missed sarcasm: watch word.
The watch word is turn around. 
Bring it on!
The whole table.

PIG: Progress is Good!
(Not to Or well[!]...exactly)
On elements or style...


Table of Context[!](to follow)...
CAUTION though.
[Updates used to leave the original date of post intact. That changed recently.
I don't know if that is a Rovism or an AlGoreRhythm, but what the google or frack.]

[!]TOC
[take to footnotes**/under construction]
frack
google*
Rhythm
recently
though- (scroll-over)
or- exactly- table- whole- word - watch- sarcasm- fair play- around- turn- convention- DNC-

*see chart
(need other image?)
** might not

Out Foxed?

Obtuseness Redux.
Why does Social Security Need 174,000 bullets?
Dems open convention playing defense of Obama.
Get the lede out?

Not to bury any ironies or unintended puns...
The first two links are referenced in the next two lines.
The third line and two links are in regard to the heading, and to the sources.
The "Obtuseness Redux" were from Comcast/AP. 
But I first went local then tan gent or BaneOr BainOr... 
the punchline has to do with they nature of Infowars(the site), a bit more journalistic and fair and balanced than FOX, not that they do not require very careful reads.   The four links seem to represent a sort of unsorting and GPS un-crossroads dynamic. And for my part, the first aspect has to do with the irony of any whining about Social Security having an Inspector General division that hunts down fraud, in this age of second amendment fruit salad or T-parties. And for the sake of any intelligence briefs or geeks, "lede" is a journalistic term not a bullet point.  The last two links are a good un-cross Rhodes* of the left.  Not quite Tin-Foil Hats, not quite Coffee Party, but maybe close enough. (4 hard work?)

* not exactly
** ibid?
(See Labels, but I note here the original four:
DNC Convention, Infowars, Seattle PI, Social Security
(I know, [...] there is a local irony...)

[and global...]***

*** Re-verse asterisk of sorts. Emphasis on not read yet and irony. Heavy on the latter.
[For Rob Sake!]
[M-bed-ed?  Actually...]

For Pete Sake!

A mace 'n grace?
The Ir(e)on Knee